P.122 Left temporal aneurysm resection: surgical approach in Pial-Pial collateral formation from the posterior temporal artery secondary to left internal artery occlusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The formation of pial-pial collateral network aneurysms due to carotid occlusion is a rare neurological phenomenon. This case details a 69-year-old male who developed a pial-pial collateral network aneurysm secondary to left internal carotid artery occlusion, leading to intracranial hemorrhage. Methods: The patient presented with altered consciousness due to left temporal intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and intraventricular hemorrhage. Cerebral angiography revealed an occluded left internal carotid artery, with superficial temporal artery (STA) and superior orbital artery anastomosis, and extensive pial-pial collaterals from the posterior temporal artery. A 4 mm aneurysm arising from this collateral network was identified. Surgical intervention involved a left temporal craniectomy and excision of the aneurysm, prioritizing the preservation of the STA. N.B., Informed patient consent was obtained in this study. Results: Successful aneurysm removal and preservation of collateral pathways were confirmed by postoperative imaging. The patient exhibited rapid neurological improvement; by postoperative day (POD) one, the patient showed limited response to stimuli. He was extubated by POD4 and discharged on POD27, where he conversed well, was independently ambulatory, and needed minimal to no assistance in activities of daily living. Conclusions: This case highlights the need for careful preoperative planning and intraoperative precision, especially in preserving vital collateral vascular pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".