Volenrelaxin (LY3540378) increases renal plasma flow: a randomized Phase 1 trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Volenrelaxin is a half-life-extended recombinant human relaxin protein developed for improving kidney perfusion and cardiorenal function. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of volenrelaxin following single- and multiple-ascending doses (SAD and MAD) administration. METHODS: In this Phase 1, four-part, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled SAD and MAD study in healthy participants, SAD participants (n = 56) received an intravenous or subcutaneous dose of volenrelaxin or placebo in a dose-ascending manner. MAD participants (n = 77) received volenrelaxin or placebo subcutaneously once weekly for 5 weeks. Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) were determined by para-aminohippurate and iohexol clearance, respectively. RESULTS: Volenrelaxin demonstrated an extended half-life and increased acute and chronic placebo-adjusted ERPF change from baseline by 50% and 44%, respectively (P < .0001). mGFR was unchanged, while filtration fraction and afferent/efferent renal arteriolar resistances were reduced. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased, and pulse rate increased with increasing volenrelaxin exposures, demonstrating maximal model-derived placebo-adjusted changes (90% confidence interval) of -6.16 (-8.04, -4.28) mmHg, -6.10 (-7.61, -4.58) mmHg and +4.39 (+3.38, +5.39) bpm, respectively. Adverse events were mild, with no difference in orthostatic hypotension between volenrelaxin and placebo. CONCLUSION: Volenrelaxin was well-tolerated, safe and suitable for weekly subcutaneous dosing. Volenrelaxin showed a sustained improvement in kidney perfusion upon repeated dosing, supporting further clinical development in chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04768855.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".