MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398787632 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2024.070210

Research on periodic intelligent inspection and maintenance of offshore platform equipment

2024· article· en· W4398787632 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen Zhang, Wenyu Song

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringEngineeringConstruction engineeringComputer scienceForensic engineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine platform equipment is crucial infrastructure in ocean engineering and resource development. However, its operation in harsh marine environments presents numerous challenges. This paper aims to explore the importance of regular intelligent detection and maintenance of marine platform equipment, and proposes a corresponding research framework. Firstly, the types and functions of marine platform equipment, as well as their roles in ocean engineering, are introduced. Secondly, the importance of regular intelligent detection for the safe operation of equipment is discussed, with an emphasis on the role of intelligent technology in the detection process. Subsequently, the role of maintenance in extending equipment lifespan and reducing accidents is analyzed, along with a discussion on the impact of different maintenance strategies. Finally, a set of detection and maintenance schemes based on intelligent technology is proposed, and its future development is discussed, aiming to provide theoretical support and technical guidance for the safe operation and sustainable development of marine platform equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207