MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perencanaan Sistem Distribusi Air Baku di Desa Galeo Baru dengan menggunakan Aplikasi WaterCAD V8i

2023· article· id· W4398789336 on OpenAlexaff
Moch Rendy Dwi Laksana Nuryatim, Ussy Andawayanti, Linda Prasetyorini

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknologi dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya Air · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaruHumanitiesArtGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desa Galeo Baru terletak pada pulau Kalimantan lebih tepatnya di Kecamatan BarongTongkok Kabupaten Kutai Barat, dalam rutinitas sehari-hari kebutuhan air baku masyarakat di Desa Galeo Baru sangat mengandalkan sumber air tanah, namun tidak semua masyarakat memilikinya. Dengan adanya sungai Goohaq nantinya dapat dijadikan suplai air baku guna memenuhi kebutuhan air baku di Desa Galeo Baru. Tujuan dari studi ini merupakan untuk merencanakan sistem jaringan air baku dari sungai Goohaq ke Desa Galeo Baru, meliputi kuantitas air, hidrolika dan rencana anggaran biaya. Untuk perencanaan jaringan dan perhitungan hidrolika menggunakan aplikasi WaterCAD V8i. Dari hasil analisa didapatkan kondisi hidrolis jaringan pipa masih memenuhi persyaratan teknis yang ditentukan, untuk kecepatan sebesar 0,100 m/dt – 2,5 m/dt, tekanan 0,5 atm – 10 atm, headloss gradient 0 m/km – 15 m/km. Dengan total rencana anggaran biaya (RAB) untuk perencanaan distribusi air baku di Desa Galeo Baru Kecamatan BarongTongkok Kabupaten Kutai Barat dengan nilai proyek sebesar Rp. 713.177.000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Teknologi dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya AirSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207