MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398795112 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.13223

The Bloch--Kato conjecture, decomposing fields, and generating cohomology in degree one

2024· preprint· en· W4398795112 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sunil K. Chebolu, Ján Mináč, Cihan Okay, Andrew Schultz, Charlotte Ure

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrongNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIllinois State University
KeywordsConjectureMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The famous Bloch--Kato conjecture implies that for a field $F$ containing a primitive $p$th root of unity, the cohomology ring of the absolute Galois group $G_F$ of $F$ with $\mathbb{F}_p$ coefficients is generated by degree one elements. We investigate other groups with this property and characterize all such groups that are finite. Restricting to the case of $p$-groups, our work answers a question of Quadrelli, Snopce and Vanacci posed in 2022. As a further step in this program, we study implications of the Bloch--Kato conjecture to cohomological invariants of finite field extensions. Conversely, these cohomological invariants have implications for refining the Bloch--Kato conjecture. In service of such a refinement, we define the notion of a decomposing field for a cohomology class of a finite field extension and study minimal decomposing fields of degree two cohomology classes arising from degree $p$ extensions. We illustrate this refinement by explicitly computing the cohomology rings of superpythagorean fields and $p$-rigid fields. Finally, we construct nontrivial examples of cohomology classes and their decomposing fields, which rely on computations by David Benson in the appendix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207