MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398914992 · doi:10.7910/dvn/wbqxxz

Active Living Feature Score

2022· dataset· en· W4398914992 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Fuller, Ali M. S. Alfosool

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceGeographyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, Ali Alfosool proposes Active Living Feature Score or ALF-Score, a novel approach to measure walkability more accurately and efficiently while addressing existing limitations. ALF-Score incorporates road network structure to derive various features such as network science centralities and network embedding which are crucial in better understanding the road structure. ALF-Score utilizes user opinion to build high-confidence ground-truth that is used to generate models capable of estimating walkability scores based on user opinion. By incorporating machine learning approaches in my pipelines, he was able to achieve a much higher granularity and higher spatial resolution of walkability scores at point level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8550.184

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207