MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398957684 · doi:10.7910/dvn/txqgrs

Executive Agreements Database, Statement Concerning the Administrative Arrangement with Canada For Cooperation And The Exchange Of Information In Nuclear Regulatory Matters, with Appendices. Signed At Washington March 13, 2007. Entered Into Force March 13, 2007.

2020· dataset· en· W4398957684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatement (logic)Executive summaryExecutive branchPolitical scienceExecutive boardPublic administrationDatabaseBusinessLawManagementComputer scienceEconomicsPoliticsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KAV 8009 First signed 03/13/2007 Last signed 03/13/2007 Entry into force (supplemented by last signed) 03/13/2007 CAR 2007-086 stamped 07-86 C06572564 cover memo

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.020
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1610.214

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207