MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398990728 · doi:10.61788/njn.spec.18.5

Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

2018· article· en· W4398990728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O.Sh. Eshonov, U.B. Oltiev, M.M. Zhamolov

Bibliographic record

VenueNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionPostoperative cognitive dysfunctionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineAnesthesiaIncidence (geometry)PsychologyCognitive impairmentClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An evaluation of the incidence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (PDCD) in patients after various operations performed under conditions of general anesthesia was implemented. To assess cognitive abilities, the Montreal Cognitive Evaluation Scale (MoCA) and the 10-word test, was used. A study was made of the state of cognitive functions in the postoperative period after various operations under conditions of general anesthesia in 112 patients (40 women and 72 men) with a neurological and psychosomatic history. It was found that general anesthesia causes a decrease in cognitive parameters from 3 to 7 days and within 1-3 months after surgery in 55.3% of patients. The conducted study confirms the high prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in anaesthesiological practice in the postoperative period. The practical significance of the PDCD concept is the possibility of prevention, early diagnosis of cognitive disorders and the initiation of neuroprotective treatment in the postoperative period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGYSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207