MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399010981 · doi:10.1080/14786419.2024.2357663

Natural 3,4-Dihydro-2(1 <i>H</i> )-quinolinones – part III: biological activities

2024· review· en· W4399010981 on OpenAlex
Shahriar Khadem, Robin J. Marles

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Product Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTraditional medicineStereochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural products have played a crucial role in drug discovery, but their development is hindered by challenges such as inadequate availability and complex synthesis methods. However, both natural and synthetic compounds that have the core structure of 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, also known as 2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (2O-THQ), display a diverse array of effects in both central and peripheral tissues, with some showing therapeutic potential in treating various disorders. Despite the significance of this family of compounds, the current literature lacks comprehensive coverage of their biological functions. This article aims to address this gap by extensively reviewing the biological activities of 2O-THQ alkaloids from diverse organisms and exploring their potential to serve as a source of innovative bioactive natural products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it