MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399021120 · doi:10.5430/jct.v13n2p244

The Benefits of Informal Learning Garnered Through Participation in the Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) Project

2024· article· en· W4399021120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lauren Birney, D. McNamara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumEngineering ethicsScience educationEnvironmental educationSociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) Project has several goals, with its primary focus on connecting the students of New York City with the enormous potential of restoring New York Harbor to its former self. Through the collaboration of numerous partners representing all of the facets of the city to the marginalized students living in hundreds of under-resourced communities, out-of-school experiences such as participation in the annual Science Symposium and the environmental fieldwork conducted along the shores of New York Harbor flourished. The CCERS STEM + C Project enables the merging of these entities for the good of its participants and the enormous benefit to the environment's restoration. This study consists of student surveys administered to and completed by 513 students attending schools throughout New York City's five boroughs. Of those who responded to the ethnicity section of the survey, 43.7% represent minority students. Data indicated a significant increase in STEM motivation by the CCERS STEM + C participating students, particularly those who identify as members of the under-represented minority group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicInnovative Education and Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207