The Benefits of Informal Learning Garnered Through Participation in the Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) Project has several goals, with its primary focus on connecting the students of New York City with the enormous potential of restoring New York Harbor to its former self. Through the collaboration of numerous partners representing all of the facets of the city to the marginalized students living in hundreds of under-resourced communities, out-of-school experiences such as participation in the annual Science Symposium and the environmental fieldwork conducted along the shores of New York Harbor flourished. The CCERS STEM + C Project enables the merging of these entities for the good of its participants and the enormous benefit to the environment's restoration. This study consists of student surveys administered to and completed by 513 students attending schools throughout New York City's five boroughs. Of those who responded to the ethnicity section of the survey, 43.7% represent minority students. Data indicated a significant increase in STEM motivation by the CCERS STEM + C participating students, particularly those who identify as members of the under-represented minority group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".