MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early cognitive dysfunction development immunological predictors in the ischemic stroke acute period

2024· article· en· W4399021803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. M. Tynterova

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian neurological Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)Ischemic strokeMedicineStroke (engine)CognitionCardiologyInternal medicineIschemiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study is activity identification CXC family cytokines in patients with cognitive impairments in the acute period of ischemic stroke. Material and methods. 78 patients with diagnosis “Ischemic stroke” were examined. Depending on cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)) patients were divided into two groups: the 1st group — 58 patients with cognitive decline (MoCA ≤ 25 points); the 2nd group — 20 patients without cognitive decline. Neuropsychologic testing was performed on the second day of hospitalisation and included episodic memory, executive function, speech, gnosis, praxis and IQCODE parameters examination. Laboratory diagnosis consisted of level assessing of CXC family chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL9, CXCL1, CXCL8) and TNF-α cytokine in patients’ plasma on the second day of hospitalisation. Statistical analysis was employed using the Python programing language and its libraries Pandas and SciPy. Results. Statistical analysis revealed the highest level of IP-10/CXCL10 chemokines (p = 0.002) and Gro-a/CXCL1 (p = 0.044) in patients of the 1st group, statistically significant correlations of MoCA and IQCODE with IP-10/CXCL10 and Gro-a/CXCL1 concentrations, correlations of IP-10/CXCL10 concentrations with semantic information processing functions (r = –0.512), subject gnosis (r = –0.211), memory (r = 0.275), speech (r = –0.400), and Gro-a/ CXCL1 level with semantic information processing (r = –0.418). Conclusion. The study of chemokines of the CXC cluster represents a relevant and promising direction in the diagnosis and assessment of progression of early post-stroke cognitive impairment of mixed genesis due to minimal invasiveness and high specificity. Further studies are needed to verify CXCL chemokines, particularly IP-10/CXCL10 and Gro-a/CXCL1 as potential molecular markers of neurological damage in neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian neurological JournalSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207