MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A High Gain Circularly Polarized Passive RFID Tag on a Metallic Reflector for UHF Band Applications

2024· article· en· W4399039509 on OpenAlexaff
Amira Hamidi, Boualem Mekimah, Souad Berhab, Tarek Djerafi, Abdelkrim Belhedri, Mohammed Boulesbaa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltra high frequencyOpticsReflector (photography)Impedance matchingAntenna measurementSlot antennaSTRIPSAntenna (radio)Antenna gainPhysicsElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineeringAntenna factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tag using a metallic reflector is proposed to covering UHF band. The antenna consists of a metallic square loop, fed by two strips using a T-match structure in order to ensure matching in impedance between the chip and the proposed antenna. The distance between reflector and antenna is set to a quarter wavelength to achieving a maximum gain. The proposed design shows an impedance bandwidth (IBW) ranges from 907 to 932 MHz (25 MHz). Also, a long reading range up to 22.56 meters is obtained at 915 MHz. Moreover, the proposed geometry shows a broadside circularly polarized (CP) radiation with a high gain of 7.72 dBi. The proposed design is suitable for high-gain, CP radiation RFID applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207