Low-Rank Tensor Completion Pansharpening Based on Haze Correction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pansharpening refers to the fusion between a multispectral (MS) image with abundant spectral information and a panchromatic (PAN) image with high spatial resolution to obtain a high spatial resolution multispectral (HRMS) image. The traditional pansharpening methods often ignore the effect of path-radiation caused by scattering from different atmospheric components, and the few methods that introduce haze correction only calibrate each band of the MS image individually, without exploring the intrinsic correlation among different bands. To address this problem, low rank tensor completion pansharpening based on haze correction (LRTCP) is proposed. The haze-line prior is first introduced into the joint haze correction of MS and PAN images, and obtain the pre-modulated images with the help of the improved high-pass modulation (HPM) injection scheme. We then use tensor completion to simulate the degradation problem by applying low-tubal-rank tensor complementation to the process of reconstructing HRMS images, thus constructing a low rank tensor completion pansharpening model based on haze correction. Finally, the alternating direction multiplier (ADMM) is employed to find the solution of the proposed approach, producing the final fusion result. Comprehensive qualitative and quantitative assessment of reduced- and full-resolution datasets from different satellites shows that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".