MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399041129 · doi:10.1080/02331934.2024.2358086

Optimality conditions for bilevel programmes via Moreau envelope reformulation*

2024· article· en· W4399041129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptimization · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBilevel optimizationMathematicsEnvelope (radar)Mathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsMathematical economicsOptimization problemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For bilevel programmes with a convex lower-level programme, the classical approach replaces the lower-level programme with its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition and solve the resulting mathematical programme with complementarity constraint (MPCC). It is known that when the set of lower-level multipliers is not unique, MPCC may not be equivalent to the original bilevel problem, and many MPCC-tailored constraint qualifications do not hold. In this paper, we study bilevel programmes where the lower level is generalized convex. Applying the equivalent reformulation via Moreau envelope, we derive new directional optimality conditions. Even in the nondirectional case, the new optimality condition is stronger than the strong stationarity for the corresponding MPCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it