178 Fully automated coronary artery calcium score and risk categorization from non-ECG gated chest CT using deep learning and multiorgan segmentation: a validation study from national lung screening trial (NLST)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) has shown that screening with low dose CT in high-risk population was associated with reduction in lung cancer mortality. These patients are also at high risk of coronary artery disease, and we used deep learning model to automatically detect, quantify and perform risk categorisation of coronary artery calcification score (CACS) from non-ECG gated Chest CT scans. Materials and methods Automated calcium quantification was performed using a neural network based on Mask regions with convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) for multiorgan segmentation. Manual evaluation of calcium was carried out using proprietary software. This study used 80 patients to train the segmentation model and randomly selected 1442 patients were used for the validation of the algorithm. Results Our method correctly classifies the risk group in 78.8% of the cases and classifies the subjects in the same group. F-score is measured as 0.78; 0.71; 0.81; 0.82; 0.92 in calcium score categories 0(CS:0), I (1–99), II (100–400), III (400–1000), IV (>1000), respectively. 79% of the predictive scores lie in the same categories, 20% of the predictive scores are one category up or down, and only 1.2% patients were more than one category off. For the presence/absence of coronary artery calcifications, our deep learning model achieved a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 94%. Conclusion Fully automated model shows good correlation compared with reference standards. Automating the process could improve diagnostic ability, risk categorization, facilitate primary prevention intervention, improve morbidity and mortality, and decrease healthcare costs. Conflict of Interest Advisor to KARDIOLABS.AI, who developed the AI Algorithm
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".