Memory and race at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Opening in late 2014, the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (CMHR) bills itself as the only museum in the world solely devoted to human rights with the goal of reframing Canadian history through the lens of human rights ideology. The Museum both celebrates and complicates the human rights legacy of Canada and Canadians. Located in Winnipeg and created as a joint partnership between the Asper foundation, the Canadian government, the Province of Manitoba, the city of Winnipeg, and the Forks North Portage Partnership, the museum has not been a stranger to controversy over its now 6 + years of existence. This article examines the ways that the CMHR describes and complicates Canada’s human rights legacy, to understand the way the museum envisions human rights and Canada’s role in enforcing those rights. This is done through a close reading of two exhibitions in the museum focusing on race/racism in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it