MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399049575 · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03274-y

Current status of community resources and priorities for weed genomics research

2024· article· en· W4399049575 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob E. Montgomery, Sarah Morran, Dana R. MacGregor, J. Scott McElroy, Paul Neve, Célia Neto, Martín M. Vila‐Aiub, Maria Victoria Sandoval, Analía I. Menéndez, Julia M. Kreiner, Longjiang Fan, Ana L. Caicedo, Peter J. Maughan, Bianca Assis Barbosa Martins, Jagoda Mika, Alberto Collavo, Aldo Merotto, Nithya Subramanian, Muthukumar Bagavathiannan, Luan Cutti, Md Mazharul Islam, Bikram S. Gill, Robert M. Cicchillo, Roger E. Gast, Neeta Soni, Terry R. Wright, Gina Zastrow‐Hayes, Gregory D. May, Jenna Malone, Deepmala Sehgal, Shiv Shankhar Kaundun, Richard P. Dale, Juan Vorster, B. Peters, Jens Lerchl, Patrick J. Tranel, Roland Beffa, Alexandre Fournier‐Level, Mithila Jugulam, Kevin Fengler, Víctor Llaca, Eric L. Patterson, Todd A. Gaines

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWeed Control and Herbicide Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureCorteva AgriscienceFoundation for Food and Agriculture ResearchU.S. Department of AgricultureBayerNovo Nordisk Fonden
KeywordsBiologyGenomicsAdaptation (eye)BiotechnologyAgricultureWeedSelection (genetic algorithm)Environmental resource managementEcologyGenomeGeneticsComputer scienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weeds are attractive models for basic and applied research due to their impacts on agricultural systems and capacity to swiftly adapt in response to anthropogenic selection pressures. Currently, a lack of genomic information precludes research to elucidate the genetic basis of rapid adaptation for important traits like herbicide resistance and stress tolerance and the effect of evolutionary mechanisms on wild populations. The International Weed Genomics Consortium is a collaborative group of scientists focused on developing genomic resources to impact research into sustainable, effective weed control methods and to provide insights about stress tolerance and adaptation to assist crop breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.059
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0590.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.012
Open science0.0080.014
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome biologySame topicWeed Control and Herbicide ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207