Application of pressure homogenization on whole human milk pasteurized by high hydrostatic pressure: Effect on protein aggregates in milk fat globule membrane and skim milk phases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explored the impact of homogenization (at pressures of 16, 30, and 45 MPa) on both raw and high hydrostatic pressure (HHP)-treated human milk (HM). It focused on protein compositions and binding forces of soluble and insoluble fractions for both milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) and skim milk. Mild homogenization of HHP-treated milk increased lactoferrin (LF) levels in the insoluble fractions of both MFGM and skim milk, due to insoluble aggregation through hydrophobic interactions. Intense homogenization of HHP-treated milk decreased the LF level in the MFGM fractions due to the LF desorption from the MFGM, which increased LF level in the insoluble skim milk fraction. Homogenized-HHP treated milk showed noticeably higher casein (CN) level at the MFGM compared to homogenized-raw milk, attributed to HHP effect on CN micelles. Overall, the combined use of HHP and shear-homogenization should be avoided as it increased the biological proteins in insoluble fractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".