MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399069833 · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104160

Correlation of in vitro cell viability and cumulative singlet oxygen luminescence from protoporphyrin IX in mitochondria and plasma membrane

2024· article· en· W4399069833 on OpenAlexaff
Buhong Li, Yi Shen, Huiyun Lin, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsProtoporphyrin IXSinglet oxygenLuminescenceMitochondrionIn vitroViability assayMembraneCellChemistryReactive oxygen speciesPhotochemistryBiophysicsOxygenBiochemistryMaterials scienceBiologyPhotodynamic therapyOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be targeted toward different subcellular localizations and it is proposed that different subcellular targets vary in their sensitivity to photobiological damage. Since singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) has a very short lifetime with a limited diffusion length in cellular environments, measurement of cumulative 1 O 2 luminescence is the most direct approach to compare the PDT sensitivity of mitochondria and plasma membrane. PDT-generated near-infrared 1 O 2 luminescence at 1270 nm was measured together with cell viability for 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) and exogenous PpIX, at different incubation times. Confocal fluorescence microscopy indicated that ALA-induced PpIX (2 h) localized in the mitochondria, whereas exogenous PpIX (1 h) mainly localized to the plasma membrane. Cell viability was determined at several time points during PDT treatments using colony-forming assays, and the surviving fraction correlated well with cumulative 1 O 2 luminescence counts from PpIX in mitochondria and plasmas membrane, respectively. The mitochondria are more sensitive than the plasma membrane by a factor of 1.7. The potential value of direct 1 O 2 luminescence dosimetry for comparing the PDT sensitivity of different subcellular organelles was demonstrated, which could be useful for developing subcellular targeted-novel photosensitizers to enhance PDT efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic TherapySame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207