MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399072641 · doi:10.1117/12.3022411

En route to a practical ring-resonator thermometer with an uncertainty of 1 mK

2024· article· en· W4399072641 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sergey Dedyulin, Vraj Patel, Siegfried Janz, Dan‐Xia Xu, Ross Cheriton, Shurui Wang, Martin Vachon, John Weber

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermometerResonatorRing (chemistry)Measurement uncertaintyComputer scienceTemperature measurementElectrical engineeringPhysicsElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon Ring Resonators (RR) are currently being assessed by several national metrology organizations as thermometers for use in calibration laboratories and in high-accuracy commercial applications. In this paper, we summarize the results of one such assessment carried out at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). The prototype of silicon RR thermometer (developed at NRC) was evaluated in the stirred liquid bath between 23 °C and 80 °C over the period of several years in order to get the full uncertainty budget. The combined 10-mK standard uncertainty for our RR thermometer is not only identical to the repeatability reported previously for an unpackaged RR but it also includes a contribution due to long-term drift of RR thermometer estimated over two consecutive 11-month periods. We also report the results of our on-going efforts to reduce the long-term drift by using the controlled gas atmosphere inside RR thermometer and discuss the ultimate accuracy achievable with our current setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207