MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399076323 · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00421

Learning Electronic Polarizations in Aqueous Systems

2024· article· en· W4399076323 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arnab Jana, Sam Shepherd, Yair Litman, David M. Wilkins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsWannier functionPolarization (electrochemistry)Computer scienceDipoleComputationAb initioPoint particleDielectricAlgorithmStatistical physicsComputational physicsPhysicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The polarization of periodically repeating systems is a discontinuous function of the atomic positions, a fact which seems at first to stymie attempts at their statistical learning. Two approaches to build models for bulk polarizations are compared: one in which a simple point charge model is used to preprocess the raw polarization to give a learning target that is a smooth function of atomic positions and the total polarization is learned as a sum of atom-centered dipoles and one in which instead the average position of Wannier centers around atoms is predicted. For a range of bulk aqueous systems, both of these methods perform perform comparatively well, with the former being slightly better but often requiring an extra effort to find a suitable point charge model. As a challenging test, we also analyze the performance of the models at the air-water interface. In this case, while the Wannier center approach delivers accurate predictions without further modifications, the preprocessing method requires augmentation with information from isolated water molecules to reach similar accuracy. Finally, we present a simple protocol to preprocess the polarizations in a data-driven way using a small number of derivatives calculated at a much lower level of theory, thus overcoming the need to find point charge models without appreciably increasing the computation cost. We believe that the training strategies presented here help the construction of accurate polarization models required for the study of the dielectric properties of realistic complex bulk systems and interfaces with ab initio accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207