In Silico Discovery and Predictive Modeling of Novel Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Inhibitors for Alzheimer's Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease, akin to coronary artery disease of the heart, is a progressive brain disorder driven by nerve cell damage. METHODS: This study utilized computational methods to explore 14 anti-acetylcholinesterase (AChE) derivatives (1 ̶ 14) as potential treatments. By scrutinizing their interactions with 11 essential target proteins (AChE, Aβ, BChE, GSK-3β, MAO B, PDE-9, Prion, PSEN-1, sEH, Tau, and TDP-43) and comparing them with established drugs such as donepezil, galantamine, memantine, and rivastigmine, ligand 14 emerged as notable. During molecular dynamics simulations, the protein boasting the strongest bond with the critical 1QTI protein and exceeding drug-likeness criteria also exhibited remarkable stability within the enzyme's pocket across diverse temperatures (300- 320 K). In addition, we utilized density functional theory (DFT) to compute dipole moments and molecular orbital properties, including assessing the thermodynamic stability of AChE derivatives. RESULT: investigations. CONCLUSION: Ligand 14 thus emerges as a promising candidate in the fight against Alzheimer's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".