MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399097124 · doi:10.3389/frsip.2024.1396077

Enhancement of single-lead dry-electrode ECG through wavelet denoising

2024· article· en· W4399097124 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelrahman Abdou, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Signal Processing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLead (geology)WaveletNoise reductionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is an important diagnostic tool for identifying cardiac issues in infants at birth. Long-term remote neonatal dry-electrode ECG monitoring solutions can be an additional step for preventive healthcare measures. In these solutions, power and computationally efficient embedded signal processing techniques for denoising newborn ECGs can assist in increasing neonatal medical wearable time. Wavelet denoising is an appropriate denoising mechanism with low computational complexity that can be implemented on embedded microcontrollers for long-term remote ECG monitoring. Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) denoising for neonatal dry-electrode ECG using different wavelet families is investigated. The wavelet families and mother wavelets used include Daubechies (db1, db2, db3, db4, and db6), symlets (sym5), and coiflets (coif5). Different levels of added white Gaussian noise (AWGN) were added to 19 newborn ECG signals, and denoising was performed to select the appropriate wavelets for neonatal dry-electrode ECG. The selected wavelets then undergo real noise additions of baseline wander and electrode motion to determine their robustness and accuracy. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean squared error (MSE), and power spectral density (PSD) are used to examine denoising performance. db1, db2, and db3 wavelets are eliminated from analysis where the 30 dB AWGN led to negative SNR improvement for at least one newborn ECG, removing important ECG information. db4 and sym5 are eliminated from selection due to their different waveform morphology compared to the dry-electrode newborn ECG’s QRS complex. db6 and coif5 are selected due to their highest SNR improvement and lowest MSE of 6.26 × 10−6 and 1.65 × 10−7 compared to other wavelets, respectively. Their wavelet shapes are more like a newborn ECG’s QRS morphology, validating their selection. db6 and coif5 showed similar denoising performance, decreasing electrode motion and baseline wander noisy ECG signals by 10 dB and 14 dB, respectively. Further denoising of inherent dry-electrode noise is observed. DWT with coif5 or db6 wavelets is appropriate for denoising newborn dry-electrode ECGs for long-term neonatal dry-electrode ECG monitoring solutions under different noise types. Their similarity to newborn dry-electrode ECGs yields accurate and robust reconstructed denoised newborn dry-electrode ECG signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Signal ProcessingSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207