Latency Minimization for UAV-Assisted MEC Networks With Blockchain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrating the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) network with the blockchain technology emerges its superiority in the network utilization, differentiated service, and security, which has been regarded as a promising technique for time-critical applications. In this paper, we propose a UAV-assisted MEC network architecture and a comprehensive data processing flow, where the UAVs cooperate with the base station in computation as edge servers and act as blockchain nodes. We formulate an optimization problem that jointly considers UAVs’ position, data offloading, and resource allocation for minimizing the total time consumption of data processing. To address this problem, we decouple it as three tractable subproblems and propose a Block Coordinate Descent (BCD)-based iterative algorithm. In addition, we analyze the task migration and resource allocation problem in computation, and obtain analytical solutions by the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. The simulated results indicate that the proposed algorithm leads to substantial performance gains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".