MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399118211 · doi:10.22148/001c.116922

Lending Books on the Left and Right Banks: Borrowing Practices at the American Library in Paris and Shakespeare and Company

2024· article· en· W4399118211 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nissa Ren Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cultural Analytics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNew LeftLeft and rightHistoryBusinessManagementPolitical scienceEconomic historyEconomicsLawEngineeringPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shakespeare and Company and the American Library in Paris (ALP) have long been represented as rivals. Yet the relationship between the two preeminent American lending libraries in Paris—both of which opened their doors after World War I as the city was becoming the heart of Anglophone modernist literature—is more complicated. This article uses records from the Shakespeare and Company lending library, historical newspapers, and the ALP’s annual *Year Book* to reveal connections between the two institutions. The article asks us to stop treating the libraries as rivals and understand them as complementary nodes in the network of Paris’s interwar Anglophone community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cultural AnalyticsSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207