MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust Virtual Network Function Optimization Under Post-Failure Uncertainty: Classical & Quantum Computing

2024· article· en· W4399119925 on OpenAlexaff
Mahzabeen Emu, Salimur Choudhury, Kai Salomaa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum annealingComputer scienceRobust optimizationMathematical optimizationChainingRobustness (evolution)Optimization problemQuantum computerInteger programmingProvisioningDistributed computingQuantumAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Service Function Chaining (SFC) failure is a rare event that comes with escalating unexpected costs. It is an overly simplistic assumption that during the installation of the Virtual Network Function (VNF) recovery instance, the network conditions impacting the cost of redeployment will remain unchanged. In this paper, we propose a deterministic optimization model using traditional Integer Linear Program-ming (ILP) that maneuvers the resource allocation for prior and post-failure SFC deployment. Afterwards, we design a robust optimization model that accounts for the uncertainty of the redeployment costs. As per the strong duality theorem, we derive the dual formulation of the robust optimization model for reduced computational complexity. Further along this line, we propose a quantum annealing-driven quadratic optimization (QUBO) model that demonstrates inherent robustness even without ex-plicitly considering the uncertainty bounds of SFC redeployment costs. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the superiority of robust solutions over deterministic approaches and explore the potential strengths of quantum annealing in terms of intrinsic resiliency. Although quantum computing is not yet ready to solve large-scale SFC deployment, it can support VNF services that demand ultra-low running time/real-time decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207