MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399120219 · doi:10.1109/vrw62533.2024.00039

An Overview of the 3rd International Workshop on eXtended Reality for Industrial and Occupational Supports (XRIOS)

2024· article· en· W4399120219 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac Cho, Kangsoo Kim, Dongyun Han, Allison Bayro, Heejin Jeong, Hyungil Kim, Hye‐Jin Moon, Myounghoon Jeon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman factors and ergonomicsEngineering ethicsEngineeringOccupational safety and healthKnowledge managementEngineering managementComputer sciencePolitical sciencePoison controlMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 3rd International Workshop on the eXtended Reality for Industrial and Occupational Supports (XRIOS) focuses on identifying the present advancements in XR research, particularly in the realms of human factors and ergonomics, as they apply to industrial and occupational tasks. The workshop also aims to explore potential future research directions. XRIOS was held for the first time at IEEE VR 2022, where it served as the first venue for building an interdisciplinary research community that bridges XR developers/practitioners and human factors and ergonomics researchers interested in industrial and occupational XR applications. XRIOS 2024, marking the first in-person workshop, follows the successes of XRIOS 2022 and 2023 in response to society's growing needs by expanding the XRIOS community and enhancing opportunities for engagement and collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207