Enfortumab vedotin (EV) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) cohorts of EV-202.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1005 Background: EV, a Nectin-4–directed antibody–drug conjugate, is approved for use in urothelial cancer. Nectin-4 is expressed in several solid tumors, including BC. EV monotherapy was evaluated in TNBC and HR+/HER2- BC in EV-202 (NCT04225117). Methods: In this open-label, multicohort, phase 2 trial, eligible adults had locally advanced or metastatic (la/m) solid tumors, measurable disease, and ECOG PS 0–1. In BC cohorts, patients (pts) had prior taxanes or anthracyclines, ≥1 standard-of-care cytotoxic regimen and ≤2 lines (L) of cytotoxic therapy for la/mBC, and prior PD-1/L1 inhibitor (TNBC) or endocrine treatment (tx) with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (HR+/HER2- BC). Nectin-4 expression was not required but was assessed retrospectively. Pts received EV 1.25 mg/kg intravenously days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-d cycle until discontinuation criteria (eg, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity) were met. Primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR); ≥10 (TNBC) or ≥12 (HR+/HER2- BC) responders out of 40 evaluable pts were needed to claim promising antitumor activity. Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. Antitumor activity was investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1. Results: In the TNBC cohort, 42 female pts received EV as of Mar 3, 2023 (median follow-up, 11.8 mo). Median age was 53 y, 64% had ≥2L systemic tx for metastatic BC, and 33% had prior sacituzumab govitecan. ORR was 19.0%. Grade ≥3 tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) in >1 pt were decreased neutrophil count (n=3, 7%), decreased white blood cell count (n=2, 5%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=2, 5%). Selected TRAEs of special interest were skin reactions (n=25, 60%), peripheral neuropathy (n=11, 26%), and hyperglycemia (n=2, 5%). In the HR+/HER2- BC cohort (median age, 57.0 y), 45 female pts received EV as of Dec 3, 2022 (median follow-up, 11.2 mo). Most (73%) had ≥3L systemic tx for metastatic BC. ORR was 15.6%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs in >1 pt were maculopapular rash (n=7, 16%), pruritus and increased aspartate aminotransferase (both n=3, 7%), and abdominal pain and erythema (both n=2, 4%). Selected TRAEs of special interest were skin reactions (n=28, 62%), peripheral neuropathy (n=12, 27%), and hyperglycemia (n=5, 11%). Additional efficacy data for both cohorts are in the table. Conclusions: EV showed antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TNBC. Safety in both cohorts was manageable and consistent with previous reports. Clinical trial information: NCT04225117 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".