Conversations With Gardens: Artful Spaces in Community Art Education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The educational potential of multimodal digital technologies performed as public pedagogies in a community art context is explored through a heritage garden and museum space in Quebec, Canada. Using a walking methodologies approach, this chapter chronicles the incubation of an immersive digital technology project that evolved from an audio walk to an experimental collaboration between les Jardins de Métis/Reford Gardens and the PRISME Innovation Lab at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts. Through an interactive digital interface, the human, nonhuman and more-than-human agents forming the Jardins de Métis community become entangled in dynamic thinking-making intra-actions, underscoring the complexity of the project. An assemblage of tensions and event-encounters with diverse agencies form intriguing connections and transversal refractions: being and becoming through public art and community exchange. Walking-with this garden initiates a metaphoric conversation, dialogic and relational, between co-constituents of a place and spaces within that place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it