Early arc crust formation preserved in the Grenadines archipelago, southern Lesser Antilles arc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intra-arc diversity in volcanic activity and composition is ubiquitous, but its underlying causes remain largely unresolved in many settings. In this work, we examine such variability in the Grenadines archipelago, southern Lesser Antilles arc. Here, juxtaposed volcanic centres exhibit eruptive longevities and chemistries distinct from northern counterparts in the same arc. Our goal is to explain this deviation by investigating variations in magmatic processes using petrological data from erupted crustal xenoliths and lavas, and interpreting these findings within the context of the archipelago's tectonic history and geophysical structure. Textural analyses of xenoliths reveal crystallization over a wide range of pressure-temperature-melt composition conditions in the crust. Mineral phases display discrete compositional trends pointing towards significant inter-island variability in underlying plumbing systems. The geochemical variety of erupted magmas is reminiscent of the entire arc. We speculate that the Grenadines represents the early onset of subduction forming the modern-day Lesser Antilles arc. Extrusive volcanism initiated as submarine activity. Subsequent uplift eroded the original topography of these volcanic centres following the eventual cessation of volcanism in the Neogene. The positioning of the Grenadines on an elevated platform provides rare modern insight into early arc crust formation not commonly preserved in established active arcs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".