MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399128155 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcskn.2024.100072

ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL Skin-Cancer Epidemiology and Correlation with Dermatologist Density and Population Risk Factors

2024· article· en· W4399128155 on OpenAlexaff
Samir Salah, Delphine Kérob, K. Ezzedine, Pankaj Khurana, Daniela Bălan, Thierry Passeron

Bibliographic record

VenueEJC Skin Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologySkin cancerDermatologyMedicineCorrelationDemographyCancerInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conclusions:The fact that there are phenocopies within melanoma families with CDKN2A mutations, shows that the known mutation is not the only factor that led to the development of melanoma, but that there are other aspects related such as fair skin, high total body nevus count and MC1R polymorphisms, among others.Due to the multifactorial etiology, in the case of a family member with a negative genetic test, the risk of developing melanoma should not be underestimated.Clinical follow-up, total body photography and digital dermoscopy should be carried out, according to individual risk factors, for the early detection of melanoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEJC Skin CancerSame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207