MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399138626 · doi:10.1089/aut.2023.0121

Proportional Overrepresentation of Gender-Diverse Identities in Two US-Based Autistic Adult Samples from the SPARK Database

2024· article· en· W4399138626 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Bungert, Cindy Li, Annie Cardinaux, Amanda O’Brien, Jonathan Cannon, Veronica Shkolnik, John D. E. Gabrieli, John F. Strang, Pawan Sinha

Bibliographic record

VenueAutism in Adulthood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSPARK (programming language)DatabasePsychologyAutismDevelopmental psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Previous literature indicates a proportional overrepresentation of both autism and autistic traits within gender-diverse populations (individuals who experience their gender identity as different from their sex assigned at birth). Emerging but limited evidence also suggests a proportional overrepresentation of gender-diverse identities in autism. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report gender diversity prevalence in autistic adults in the United States. Methods: We report the prevalence of gender diversity within two well-characterized samples of autistic adults recruited from SPARK (Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge), the largest online research database of autistic individuals to date. This study includes both an original sample (Dataset 1, n = 205) and a replication sample (Dataset 2, n = 243). In addition, we looked at the co-occurrence of anxiety and/or mood disorders with gender-diverse identities. Results: We found that 16.1% of autistic adults in Dataset 1 and 19.8% of autistic adults in Dataset 2 were gender diverse. This compares with prior findings of 0.5% to 4.5% in the general adult population. Autistic participants who were gender diverse, compared with those who were not, were up to six times more likely to report diagnosed anxiety and/or mood disorder(s). The finding of proportional overrepresentation of gender diversity in autistic individuals is consistent with reports from other countries, and higher than some previous estimates (e.g., 15%). Conclusion: These findings point to the necessity for autism research to take gender identity into account in addition to sex assigned at birth, and to pay particular attention to the mental health challenges that gender-diverse autistic individuals may face. These important steps will lead toward increased understanding of the needs of gender-diverse autistic individuals and ways to improve care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutism in AdulthoodSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207