Evaluation of Some Properties Geotechnical Ground Soils for Selected Sites in Samarra City/Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study carried out in Samarra City in central of Iraq to study some properties ground soil for selected sites.Survey was conducted and six soil samples were selected from two bore hole at depths (5 m, 10 m, 15 m) in terminal sites, coordinates were determined by using GPS.Soiltesting program was carried out at the Soil Mechanics Laboratory at University of Samarra to tested physical and chemical soil tests.Also evaluation of selected heavy metals Pb 2+ , Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , Fe 2+ , were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS).Test results of physical properties showed that the soil in upper layer to 10 m was sandy soil with gravel or silt, clay and the soil in under layer was gravelly with sand or silt, clay.According to Atterberg limits, the soil specimens were partially cohesive and had low plasticity (ML).The specific gravity values of the examined soils were ranged between 2.51-2.63 and permeability coefficient values were ranged between 1.441*10 -3 to 1.694 *10 -2 cm/sec, which refers to that the soil was medium to high permeability in the upper layer and decrease with depth.Regarding chemical properties, percentage of pH registered value (6.81-8.1),while the Sulphats, and chlorides recorded value were (13-25)% and ratios with means reached (16.5-31.5)for carbonates.From other hand heavy metals values indicated a homogenous distribution decrease with depth follows as Pb 2+ < Fe 2+ < Zn 2+ < Cu 2+ with means (61.9-125.15),(4.25-12.45),(2.65-11.6)and (1.8-4.65)respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".