Using electric vehicles to enhance power outage resilience – An agent-based modeling approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Power outages can cause severe disruption to critical infrastructure. With the predicted increase in the electrification of the transport sector, society will become even more vulnerable to the effects of power outages. While increased electric vehicle (EV) adoption will contribute to the electrification process, EVs can also offer capabilities to provide services during an outage. This paper studied the use of a fleet of EVs during the aftermath of a disaster to provide disaster relief by donating power to a shelter, delivering critical supplies and people in need, and providing transport for personnel or performing inspections. While the bulk of the past work has focused on using EVs to increase the resilience of the distribution grid, or individual buildings, to a power outage, this paper was novel in its use of an agent-based model to study EVs that are performing functions to increase the resilience of a community to an outage. The fleet of EVs were provided access to a microgrid with a solar array, one or two EV fast chargers, and three possible sizes of a storage. Useful outputs were produced and studied for such features as daily energy donated to a shelter, daily energy used at the microgrid, and the length of outages that can be supported before the energy is depleted at the microgrid. Results showed that increasing storage size at the microgrid led to substantial increases in the outage length that could be support. Additionally, it was found that focusing a fleet on delivery and transport tasks, as opposed to energy donation, could also increase the length of outages that could be supported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".