MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399148708 · doi:10.36076/ppj.2024.7.e419

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves of the Knee for the Management of Intractable Pain from Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4399148708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Physician · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisKnee painPain managementRadiofrequency ablationKnee surgerySurgeryPhysical therapyAblationAlternative medicineInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The knee joint is one of the most common diseases in elderly individuals. This is a progressive and debilitating condition. The purpose of knee osteoarthritis treatment is to manage pain, increase mobility, and improve the quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the therapeutic effect of radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) on the genicular nerves in patients with intractable pain due to knee osteoarthritis, as well as its effects on pain severity and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective outcome study. SETTING: The outpatient clinic of a single academic medical center. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study. Fifty consecutive patients with intractable knee pain due to osteoarthritis were enrolled and underwent ultrasound (US)-guided RFTC of the genicular nerves (medial superior genicular nerve, medial inferior genicular nerve, and lateral superior genicular nerve). Pain severity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and knee osteoarthritis-associated symptoms were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at pretreatment and one, 3, and 6 months after RFTC treatment. We also analyzed the relationship between therapeutic outcomes and pain severity based on pre-treatment and knee MRI findings. RESULTS: No dropouts were observed. The most significant reduction in knee symptoms associated with knee osteoarthritis was observed after one month of treatment; however, at 3 and 6 months, there was a rebound effect, leading to a decrease in therapeutic efficacy. Nonetheless, there was still a noticeable decrease in symptoms due to knee osteoarthritis compared to those prior to RFTC treatment. The effect of RFTC treatment was better when pre-treatment pain was relatively less severe, knee effusion was not severe, there were no meniscal tears in the middle or posterior zones, no bone marrow edema in the middle and posterior zones of the femur and tibia, and no severe cartilage defects in the posterior femur and middle and posterior tibia. LIMITATIONS: We conducted our study without a control or a placebo group. CONCLUSION: RFTC of the genicular nerve is a good therapeutic option for controlling intractable pain following knee osteoarthritis. In addition, we found that a lower level of pain prior to treatment, along with the absence or lesser degree of knee joint effusion, as well as an absence or less severe middle or posterior knee pathologies associated with knee osteoarthritis, can predict a more favorable therapeutic outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePain PhysicianSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207