MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Auto-machine learning for opportunistic thyroid nodule detection in lung cancer screening chest CT.

2024· article· en· W4399150161 on OpenAlexaff
Sumir Patel, Veysel Kocaman, Mehmet Burak Sayici, Nikhil Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancer screeningRadiologyLung cancerContext (archaeology)Thyroid nodulesThyroid cancerArtificial intelligenceNational Lung Screening TrialColorectal cancerMachine learningThyroidNuclear medicineCancerComputed tomographyComputer sciencePathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e13639 Background: Automated Machine Learning (Auto-ML) in medical imaging is a process that allows non-experts to utilize machine learning techniques, opening the door for non-coder physician-driven exploitation of the technology. Auto-ML was applied for opportunistic detection of thyroid nodules in the context of low-dose lung cancer screening chest CT, facilitated by an innovative platform integration. By leveraging scans originally intended for lung cancer screening, suspicious appearing asymptomatic thyroid nodules can also be screened for where technically feasible. Methods: CT scans from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) dataset were utilized. This dataset contains low-dose chest CT examinations initially used for lung cancer screening. Annotation was carried out within a no-code web-based platform, Gesund.ai. A board-certified diagnostic radiologist annotated 100 CT examinations. A case was labeled "suspicious" if it presented a thyroid nodule of 1 cm or greater in diameter, while cases with no such nodules were deemed "not suspicious." The Auto-ML feature was then engaged within the software platform for parameter adjustments to refine the model without the need for manual coding. This phase was characterized by an iterative exploration of model performance, facilitated by the platform’s robust validation tools. Results: Upon training and validation, the Auto-ML model, cultivated from 100 annotated cases and assessed against a separate set of 130 cases, demonstrated a discernment accuracy of 0.51 in identifying "suspicious" thyroid nodules with a sensitivity and precision of 0.51 and 0.62 respectively. The AUC for this class stands at 0.69, indicating a moderate ability to distinguish between the presence and absence of thyroid nodules. This metric, while foundational, offers insight into the model's potential efficacy in real-world diagnostic scenarios, reflecting the initial capabilities of the platform's Auto-ML integration in enhancing diagnostic processes. Conclusions: The findings from this study highlight the potential of Auto-ML in revolutionizing opportunistic screening for thyroid nodules via lung cancer CT. The initial accuracy rate underscores the necessity for further refinement and validation of the model, but also demonstrates the promising potential of Auto-ML. Institutional Auto-ML would include extraction of appropriate studies through the no-code software platform integrated directly within the PACS framework. This process would ensure data immobility and foster a secure environment for dataset creation. Annotation would be carried out by multiple physician imagers within the same facility, enhancing the data’s accuracy and comprehensiveness specific for the institution’s patient population. This exploration highlights the strategic role of Auto-ML in advancing cancer patient care through innovative technological integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→