MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The 1st Workshop on 5G and Machine Learning for IoT and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)

2023· article· en· W4399154723 on OpenAlexaff
Henry Leung, Nan Xie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDroneComputer scienceInternet of ThingsExploitArtificial intelligenceSustainabilityMachine to machineSystems engineeringEmbedded systemComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of 5G and machine learning technologies leads to new opportunities and challenges to exploit new features for performance and security of Internet of Things (IoT) and robotic systems. The development of a new 5G-enabled and machine learning-aided communications & computing framework towards enhanced decision-making in IoT will be important in scenarios such as real-time surveillance for smart city, environmental sustainability, and defense applications. With advantages in mobility, higher line-of-sight and ease of use, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) has high potential for developments to enhance communication and processing. This workshop discussed the research and progress made in this direction, including some of the synergies and opportunities in 5G-VA V processing to enhance terrestrial IoT networks, machine learning for UAV optimization and prediction in 5G networks, as well as UAV's for situation awareness. The development of a new 5G-enabled and machine learning (ML)-aided communications & computing framework towards enhanced decision-making in IoT will be important in scenarios such as real-time surveillance for smart city, sustainability, and defence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207