Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au fil du temps, le toponyme Témiscouata a désigné un lac, un portage, une seigneurie, et plus récemment, une région administrative sous la forme d’abord d’une circonscription électorale, aujourd’hui d’une municipalité régionale de comté. Cet ouvrage retrace l’histoire du Témiscouata d’avant la Confédération. Plusieurs sujets y sont traités en profondeur parmi lesquels l’état du territoire pendant et après la dernière glaciation, les occupants préhistoriques, les Etchemins-Malécites, le Portage de Témiscouata, les premiers projets de colonisation, la vie précaire des pionniers, la seigneurie du lac Témiscouata et de Madawaska, le séjour du seigneur Alexandre Fraser au lac Témiscouata, l’arrivée des barons du bois américains, la frontière internationale, l’occupation militaire, le traité de Webster-Ashburton, l’exploitation forestière avant 1850, la frontière avec le Nouveau-Brunswick, l’essor démographique d’après 1850, la construction du chemin neuf entre 1856 et 1866, l’ouverture des terres de la Couronne à la colonisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".