MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399164150 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928532

On the Other Shore: The Atlantic Worlds of Italians in South America during the Great War by John Starosta Galante (review)

2024· article· en· W4399164150 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abril Liberatori

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreAncient historyHistoryOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: On the Other Shore: The Atlantic Worlds of Italians in South America during the Great War by John Starosta Galante Abril Liberatori Galante, John Starosta – On the Other Shore: The Atlantic Worlds of Italians in South America during the Great War. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2022. 264 p. On the Other Shore marks historian John Starosta Galante's first monograph, a point of intersection for his expertise in Latin American, Atlantic, global war, and Italian immigration histories. A social history of Italian communities in South America, it is an ambitious effort. The monograph paints a picture of the multiple transnational relationships between Italy and three Italian immigrant settlements (Sao Paulo, Brazil; Montevideo, Uruguay; and Buenos Aires, Argentina) during and immediately after the First World War. It explores the ways in which the global conflict affected the lives of Italians and their descendants in South America and how those communities "balanced and blended relationships" with Italy and with their countries of settlement. The book (1) explores how Italians and their institutions in South America reacted to the war; (2) examines the transnational reach of concepts like nationalism; and (3) [End Page 186] explores how Italian South Americans understood their place within American, transatlantic, and Italian Atlantic networks. Importantly, it explores how these big themes play out in the context and immediate aftermath of the First World War. For Galante, the global conflict's effect on these communities is a central component of the development of an Italo-Atlantic identity. Galante uses the framing device of the Atlantic world to understand the actors and actions he brings to life (here he borrows from Diego Galeano's conception of a "South American Atlantic"). He argues that the First World War and its aftermath impacted the ways South American Italians understood themselves and identified with the spaces they inhabited. He ultimately concludes that the conflict ushered in a shift from an Italian Atlantic to an Italo-Atlantic, a concept marked by a greater emphasis on hyphenated notions of identity rooted deeply in Italian origins, but situated within Atlantic South America, not in Italy or Italian nationalism (one of Donna Gabaccia's "many diasporas," Galante notes [pp. 125, 156]). The first chapter explores how officials and intellectuals in Italy managed and wrote about emigrant affairs. Here and throughout, there is valuable information about the important but underfunded and under-supported role of the Emigration Commission in putting into practice the promises made by the Italian government to its global emigrants. This chapter is especially relevant to scholars of the global Italian diaspora. Galante's next chapters move his analysis to Buenos Aires and Montevideo (Chapter 2) and Sao Paulo (Chapter 3). Here he delves into the (mostly written) worlds of pro-war organizers in those regions (primarily community elites, businessmen, and diplomats). Chapter 4 shifts gears to examine how anti-war activists (often equated, rightfully, with organized labour) responded to the ongoing conflict across South America, and how both ethnicity but also social class impacted their organization and response to the war effort. Here, Galante's discussion about familial guilt as a strategy for dissuading Italian family members from supporting the war effort helps ground the chapter and serves as just one example of how Galante gives his subjects agency in a world that can so often be read through the lens of institutions and nation-states. Finally, Chapter 5 focuses on the post-war period (1919–1921), unpacking the forces that led to a new emphasis on what Galante calls "alternative notions of belonging that embraced migrant dualities" (p. 25). Here, Galante's assertive voice and tight prose come to a head; the book's central thesis comes to light and makes these last two chapters the monograph's strongest. On the Other Shore is a study in the Herculean task of transnational historical research, buttressed by archival sources from over 32 archival institutions in five different countries. Galante's use of secondary literature similarly spans a multitude of disciplines and geographic areas, and he displays this command well. Analysis often rests heavily on the ethnic presses and other newspaper publications in South America, but Galante couples this with private...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207