Indigenous Ministry Training and Governance in the Anglican and United Churches of Canada, 1970s–1980s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Throughout the 1960s, the Anglican and United Churches of Canada, influenced by global secularization, international theology trends, and their declining role in the Indian residential school system, sought to examine their Indigenous-church policies and shift away from assimilation and paternalism and toward supporting Indigenous leadership. This article explores two outcomes of their reforms: the creation of (1) specialized Indigenous ministry training and (2) Indigenous-driven church governance structures. Meaningful reforms that extended beyond performative measures, although slow, difficult, and resisted by some, were spearheaded by Indigenous church leaders who fought to have their voices heard and effect change. Their efforts laid the groundwork for future Anglican and United Church Indigenization and reconciliation processes. Abstract: Au cours des années 1960, les Églises anglicane et unie du Canada, influencées par la sécularisation mondiale, les tendances théologiques internationales et le déclin de leur rôle dans le système des pensionnats pour Autochtones, ont cherché à examiner leurs politiques relatives à la présence des populations amérindiennes en leur sein, et à s'éloigner de l'assimilation et du paternalisme pour soutenir le leadership de ces dernières. Cet article se penche sur deux résultats de ces réformes : la création (1) d'une formation autochtone spécialisée au ministère pastoral et (2) des structures de gouvernance ecclésiale dirigées par des Autochtones. Bien que lentes, difficiles et contestées par certains, des réformes significatives allant au-delà de mesures purement exécutoires ont été menées par des responsables autochtones qui se sont mobilisés pour faire entendre leur voix et obtenir des changements. Leurs efforts ont permis de jeter les bases des processus ultérieurs d'indigénisation et de réconciliation de l'Église anglicane et de l'Église unie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".