MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399164239 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928544

Kingdom of Barracks: Polish Displaced Persons in Allied-Occupied Germany and Austria by Katarzyna Nowak (review)

2024· article· en· W4399164239 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jadwiga Biskupska

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Kingdom of Barracks: Polish Displaced Persons in Allied-Occupied Germany and Austria by Katarzyna Nowak Jadwiga Biskupska Nowak, Katarzyna – Kingdom of Barracks: Polish Displaced Persons in Allied-Occupied Germany and Austria. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2023. 343 p. Following the robust scholarship on humanitarianism in the wake of the First World War by historians like Bruno Cabanes and Kimberly Lowe Frank, Katarzyna Nowak's Kingdom of Barracks asks about the role of nationalism in the post-war fate of Polish refugees. Nowak's book enters a crowded field that examines the post–Second World War tribulations of different communities, especially Holocaust survivors and the Vertriebene, ethnic Germans who fled or were expelled from eastern Europe at the end of the war. How was the Polish experience distinct, and where does it fit in one of history's key moments of human movement? This uchodźstwo—exile—separate from but contextualized against earlier Polish economic and political migrations, is Nowak's story. Her subject is the hundreds of thousands of ethnic Poles (broadly speaking; initially including Polish Jews) who ended up in Allied-occupied Germany and Austria in 1945, a heterogenous group of Holocaust survivors, former foreign and slave labourers, released concentration camp prisoners, prisoners of war (POWs), and others. This group was heavily male and faced a complex problem that their peer Belgian, Italian, and French displaced persons (DPs) did not that makes their case a fascinating test of humanitarian bureaucracy in the unfolding Cold War: the state keen to repatriate them—the new Polish People's Republic (PRL)—was socialist, under Moscow's control, and not in the same place on the map as the interwar Second Polish Republic where they had been born. For many DPs, including POWs who had fought in the Polish Army (WP) and members of the Home Army (AK) imprisoned in Germany, life under socialism meant enormous scrutiny, and could mean prison or the Gulag. A portion did not want to "return" to a country where they had never lived, originally from territories seized by the Soviet Union. Others simply wanted a post-war life in the West, and some, of course, were keen to return to a state that was very much their home. Technically on German or Austrian territory, these dipisi were thus managed by a coalition of occupying states and contested between two governments—the London Polish exiles, derecognized by the Western Allies in summer 1945, and the new Polish People's Republic, keen to claim bodies to settle its war-denuded territories and rebuild its shattered economy. (The Germans and Austrians were not a factor—this is not a book about the agency of central European states.) The Allies recognized some vague DP right or privilege to determine their lives but were also keen to pass off the burden of their maintenance and get them settled somewhere, running the story into the touchy subject of early Cold War immigration policy. The Polish DPs thus found themselves in a bureaucratic labyrinth they had to navigate on an uncertain timeline of foreign goodwill. Nowak traces their experiences from 1945 to 1952 in thematic chapters in a bottom-up cultural and social history that includes and is sometimes able to showcase DP perspectives, even workmen and peasants of limited education. What allows for this is a source base of oral history interviews with the former DPs held in collections where they eventually settled, a robust [End Page 216] Polish-language memoir literature from the same, publications written for and by the DPs, and the library of material produced by the states, committees, and NGOs that aided, observed, and propagandized them as they settled across the globe. Infelicities of translation and phrasing are inevitable from such writings and crop up frequently. Most of these DPs, as the author highlights, were not people who had held positions of social, cultural, or political influence in interwar Poland, but were of humbler origins and far outside the purview of previous institutional history. One exception is the writer Tadeusz Borowski, well known for his Auschwitz short story This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen and who ended the war...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207