MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399164243 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928535

Champagne in Britain, 1800–1914: How the British Transformed a French Luxury by Graham Harding (review)

2024· article· en· W4399164243 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Clemis

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt historyEconomic geographyEconomic historyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Champagne in Britain, 1800–1914: How the British Transformed a French Luxury by Graham Harding David Clemis Harding, Graham – Champagne in Britain, 1800–1914: How the British Transformed a French Luxury. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. 295 p. Graham Harding has taken the agreeable subject of champagne and provided us with a very rich and detailed study of branding and marketing in nineteenth-century Britain. Inevitably, this story is a complex weaving together of elements of the period's social and cultural history in an account of commercial practices, commodity production, and consumption. In doing so, it seeks to show how the English changed the substance and perception of champagne over the course of the nineteenth century. Along the way, Harding touches on a variety of other matters such as the construction of gender identities, British imperial identity and influence, and class relations. But this book is pre-eminently, and at its best, a study in the development of luxury product branding. Harding strives to show us how the collective branding of champagne as a product, and the branding strategies of particular producers, anticipated or even marked the path for luxury good branding and marketing across the nineteenth century to this day. Harding charts the changes to the product and the growth of its consumption over the course of the nineteenth century. In 1800, champagne was as often consumed still as sparkling; and as the century progressed, for British consumers at least, it was made increasingly dry. The growth of attitudes favouring more moderate drinking, "the temperate turn," and the decline of duties on lighter wines relative to those imposed on fortified wines and other alcoholic beverages, are seen as conducive to increased champagne consumption. Harding notes several factors that help account for champagne's growing sales and popularity in the first half of the nineteenth century. Beyond the generally increasing affluence of a burgeoning bourgeois society with its growing demand for luxury goods, champagne gained a particular acceptance because it meshed so well with prevailing or emerging social mores. Champagne's relatively low alcohol by volume made it more attractive across a society in which "the temperate turn" prompted expectations of moderate alcohol consumption and more sober comportment. For this reason, and belief in the relatively mild, transience of its [End Page 193] intoxicating effects, champagne was thought to be "unique among wines" as a product "that women could legitimately enjoy." Changing patterns of sociability, especially the growing importance of the private dinner party, made the relative ease of serving champagne and the greater assurance of its quality and health-giving properties very attractive to the emerging middle classes. Demand for champagne is further thought to be stimulated, from 1860, when William Gladstone reduced taxes on lower alcohol content beverages in an effort to promote more healthy patterns of consumption. Important as such factors were in the growing demand for champagne, the key developments that would set the stage for a kind of branding revolution in the second half of the nineteenth century were centred on the production process. From the 1840s, it became possible for champagne producers to more readily control the colour, sweetness, and effervescence of their product. This, together with enhanced blending of base wines from various vineyards and vintage years, further allowed producers to better assure the consistency of the distinctive taste of their particular product. Finally, while most wines were imported to England in casks and bottled by a distributor there, problems of spoilage meant that champagne had to be bottled by the producer. Thus, the ability to better craft the product, and the close association of the bottle and label design to the product, would become important preconditions to the building modern brand identities. The London agents of the great French producers became critical, not only to the building of the various brands' identities but also the general, collective identity of champagne and the social and cultural meanings of its consumption. Through his prodigious research, Harding tells a complex story of the various strategies employed by these agents to stimulate champagne sales and promote demand for higher-margin products. From the 1860s, agents acting as representatives of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicWine Industry and TourismFrench-language works237,207