On Semi-Blind Source Separation-Based Approaches to Nonlinear Echo Cancellation Based on Bilinear Alternating Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) is a crucial task in full duplex communications. As conventional linear filtering approaches are ineffective to deal with double-talk, various semi-blind source separation (SBSS)-based AEC algorithms are deceived, most of which are formulated and implemented in the frequency domain based on the multiplicative transfer function (MTF) model for computational efficiency. To avoid large latency and in order to deal with loudspeaker nonlinearities, the convolutive transfer function (CTF) model and odd power series expansion are leveraged, which are employed by numerous SBSS-based nonlinear AEC (SBSS-NAEC) algorithms. Conventional SBSS-NAEC methods estimate the series expansion coefficients and the CTF filter simultaneously making the number of free parameters to estimate large. Hence, the corresponding algorithms are computationally expensive and are difficult to optimize. In this work, we propose to decouple the series expansion coefficients and the CTF filters into a bilinear form and present a bilinear alternating optimization framework for estimating the model parameters. An alternating iterative projection (AIP) algorithm and an alternating element-wise iterative source steering (AEISS) algorithm are proposed. As the bilinear representation consists of less parameters compared to the conventional methods, the proposed algorithms not only improve the AEC performance but also reduce the computational complexity, which is validated by comprehensive simulations and experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it