MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399174697 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-1611

Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols at Wuhan, China

2024· preprint· en· W4399174697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yun He, Dongzhe Jing, Zhenping Yin, Kevin Ohneiser, Fan Yi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesAerosolRadiative forcingClimatologyLidarAnticycloneVolcanoPlumeStratosphereMeteorologyGeologyGeographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Stratospheric aerosols are long-lived and play a critical role in the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, contributions to stratospheric aerosols from different sources have changed due to weaker volcanic activity and more frequent wildfire events. However, long-term observations of stratospheric aerosols and monitoring of major emission events remain insufficient, particularly at middle and low latitudes. In this study, we analyze the vertical distribution, optical properties, and radiative forcing of stratospheric aerosols using observations from a ground-based polarization lidar in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E) from 2010 to 2021. The stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) generally stabilized around 0.0023 without significant annual variation. Several cases of volcanic aerosol and wildfire-induced smoke were observed. Volcanic aerosols from the Nabro (2011) and Raikoke (2019) eruptions (both in boreal summer) increased the sAOD to 4.8 times the background level during the stratospheric-quiescent period (January 2013 to August 2017). Tracers of smoke from the Canadian wildfire in the summer of 2017 was observed twice: at 19–21 km on 14–17 September and at 20–23 km on 28–31 October, with plume-isolated AOD of 0.002–0.010 and particle linear depolarization ratio δp of 0.14–0.18, indicating the dominance of non-aged smoke particles. During these summertime events, the injected stratospheric aerosols were captured by the large-scale Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA), confining the transport pathway to mid-latitude Asia. On 8–9 November 2020, smoke plumes originating from the California wildfire in October 2020 appeared at 16–17 km, with a plume-isolated AOD of 0.007 and a mean δp of 0.13. Regarding seasonal variation, the sAOD in the cold half-year (0.0026) is 24 % larger than in the warm half-year (0.0021) due to stronger meridional transport of stratospheric aerosols from the tropics to middle latitudes. The stratospheric radiative forcing was -0.05 W·m-2 during the stratospheric-quiescent period and increased to -0.28 W·m-2 when volcanic aerosols were largely injected. These findings contribute to our understanding of the sources and transport patterns of stratospheric aerosols over mid-latitude Asia and serve as important database for the validation of model outputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→