MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399177038 · doi:10.1609/icaps.v34i1.31455

Exact Multi-objective Path Finding with Negative Weights

2024· article· en· W4399177038 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Ahmadi, Nathan Sturtevant, Daniel Harabor, Mahdi Jalili

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersState Government of VictoriaAustralian Government
KeywordsMathematical optimizationShortest path problemComputer sciencePath (computing)Point (geometry)GraphEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTask (project management)Pareto optimalAlgorithmMulti-objective optimizationMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The point-to-point Multi-objective Shortest Path (MOSP) problem is a classic yet challenging task that involves finding all Pareto-optimal paths between two points in a graph with multiple edge costs. Recent studies have shown that employing A* search can lead to state-of-the-art performance in solving MOSP instances with non-negative costs. This paper proposes a novel A*-based multi-objective search framework that not only handles graphs with negative costs and even negative cycles but also incorporates multiple speed-up techniques to enhance the efficiency of exhaustive search with A*. Through extensive experiments, our algorithm demonstrates remarkable success in solving difficult MOSP instances, outperforming leading solutions by several factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and SchedulingSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207