MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399178267 · doi:10.4324/9781003096016-11

“Two-Eyed Seeing” and teaching classical literature

2024· book-chapter· en· W4399178267 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aven McMaster

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My name is Aven McMaster and I am a settler of European ancestry. My father came to Canada from England when he was twelve, and my mother was born in Toronto, although her family came from England and Ireland at various points in the twentieth century. I was born in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on the traditional, unceded territories of the Algonquin nation, but did not know the history of that land when I was growing up. I now live and work in the city of Sudbury, Ontario, Canada on the traditional Anishinaabe territory of the Atikameksheng Anishnawbek and Wahnapitae First Nation, within the boundaries of the Robinson Huron Treaty of 1850 . Until recently I was a professor of Ancient Studies, and I come to the work discussed in this chapter after years of slowly realizing how harmful and destructive the history of my discipline has been, and how embedded it is within the colonial structures of Canada as a settler state and the university as a colonial institution. I also come to this work with the help of Indigenous colleagues and students who have aided me to see some of the unlearning I need to do, and the changes that I need to be part of making. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207