La participation sociale des personnes aînées : un pilier au développement des communautés locales ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des résultats d’une étude qualitative, conduite en contexte pandémique (2020-2023), notre contribution s’intéresse aux apports de la participation sociale des personnes aînées au regard du développement des communautés. Le concept de la participation sociale en gérontologie et son articulation avec le développement des communautés locales seront mis en perspective, puis le cadre méthodologique sera exposé. Les résultats révèlent que, contrairement aux idées reçues qui positionnent les personnes aînées comme des réceptacles passifs de soin, elles peuvent agir comme moteur de l’action collective; elles sont partie prenante du système local d’action et développent des initiatives favorisant l’innovation socioterritoriale afin de répondre à un problème social ou à un besoin de la communauté. Leurs contributions participatives favorisent le développement de communautés riches et résilientes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".