MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiomyopathy in First-Degree Relatives of Patients Presenting With Acute Myocarditis: Prevalence and Prognostic Significance

2024· article· en· W4399184160 on OpenAlexaff
Jacinthe Boulet, Neal K. Lakdawala, M. Christiansen, Morten Schou, Lars Køber, Finn Gustafsson, Gunnar Gislason, Christian Torp‐Pedersen, Charlotte Andersson

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Heart Failure · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisInternal medicineHeart failureDilated cardiomyopathyOdds ratioIncidence (geometry)Ejection fractionCardiologyPopulationCardiomyopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute myocarditis has been genetically linked to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the clinical significance remains uncertain. We investigated the prevalence and long-term prognosis of DCM and heart failure (HF) among unselected patients hospitalized with acute myocarditis and their first-degree relatives compared with an age- and sex-matched cohort. METHODS: This was an observational study utilizing the Danish nationwide registries, where all patients with a first-time myocarditis diagnosis from 1995 to 2018 were identified and matched (on birth year and sex) with 10 controls from the general population. RESULTS: Totally 3176 patients with acute myocarditis and 31 760 controls were included (median age, 49.8 [Q1–Q3, 32.5–70.2] years; 35.6% female). At baseline, patients with myocarditis had a higher prevalence of DCM (7 [0.2%] versus 8 [0.0%]) and HF (336 [10.6%] versus 695 [2.2%]) than controls; P <0.0001 for both. Patients with myocarditis more often had siblings with DCM (12 [0.4%] versus 17 [0.05%]) or HF (36 [1.1%] versus 89 [0.3%]); P <0.0001, odds ratios 7.09 (3.38–14.85) and 2.92 (1.25–6.80), respectively, whereas parental DCM and HF did not differ among patients with myocarditis and controls. Patients with myocarditis had greater 20-year incidence of DCM, HF, and all-cause mortality (0.5% [0.3%–0.9%], 15% [13%–17%], and 47% [44%–50%]) compared with controls (0.06% [0.03%–0.11%], 6.8% [6.4%–7.3%], and 34% [33%–35%]; P <0.0001). Having a first-degree relative with DCM or HF was associated with increased long-term mortality among the patients with myocarditis (hazard ratio, 1.40 [1.11–1.77]) but not among the controls (hazard ratio, 0.90 [0.81–1.01]; P difference =0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Acute myocarditis aggregates with DCM within families, where it carries a worsened prognosis. A differential association between parents and siblings (with sibling preponderance) could suggest that additional environmental factors are important for myocarditis development even in predisposed individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Heart FailureSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207