MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399185466 · doi:10.1017/s1368980024001113

Feasibility and measurement error in using food supply data to estimate diet costs in Canada – ERRATUM

2024· erratum· en· W4399185466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriella Luongo, Valerie Tarasuk, Yanqing Yi, Catherine L. Mah

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Nutrition · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood supplyStatisticsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthFood scienceEconometricsComputer scienceMedicineEconomicsMathematicsAgricultural scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the above article there are errors in Table 1.Within the Meat products food group, the BNS food category lines for Bacon, Ham: Cured -Lean Only, Ham: Cured -Lean þ Fat, and Liver Pate should be removed.In the Processed meats food group, Sausage (BNSD30A) matched to Wieners in the CPI should be added.The correct table is below:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.111
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.111
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.516
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic Health NutritionSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207