MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399188091 · doi:10.1515/9782760557291-002

Préface 2

2022· book-chapter· fr· W4399188091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre-Paul Malenfant

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Computer sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

social Président de l'Ordre des travailleurs sociaux et des thérapeutes conjugaux et familiaux du Québec La pandémie de COVID-19, de laquelle nous peinons toujours à émerger au moment d'écrire ces lignes, figure parmi les grands sinistres auxquels est confrontée la population mondiale depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale.Un sinistre inédit, une pandémie, comme nous n'en avions jamais connu et qui nous aura forcés à revoir nos façons de faire et de penser.Chose certaine, ce virus nous a amenés, individuellement et collectivement, à remettre en question nos certitudes et nos convictions les plus profondes.Non seulement, en l'espace de quelques semaines, nous nous sommes mis à craindre pour notre santé et celle de nos proches, mais nous avons également dû composer avec les effets sur notre mode de vie.Toutes les sphères de notre société sans exception ont été touchées. XVI Pratiques d'intervention sociale et pandémieSi nous pouvions nous attendre à ce que les populations les plus vulnérables vivent plus durement les contrecoups de la pandémie, comme c'est le cas dans la grande majorité des sinistres, ce que nous avions peut-être sousestimé, c'était l'ampleur du défi rencontré par les organismes communautaires.Devant l'incapacité des services publics de santé et de services sociaux

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5140.239

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooks→Same topicFrench Urban and Social Studies→French-language works237,207→